Can't wait tell next year and see what happens!!! Go Favre and go Packers!!!

I see you are caught in a catch 22!!!! I can't wait either, only time will tell and it's fun raising hell w/you cheddarheads in the mean time.

Favre
A league spokesman denies speculation that the NFL has already approved the mass production of Brett Favre Vikings jerseys.
"We wait until there is a player contract that has been approved," Brian McCarthy said. "Nothing has transpired from here." Reebok is believed to have produced screens of the No. 4 jerseys, but they could be destroyed if Favre doesn't end up with the Vikings. He's almost certain to, though, and the merchandise could threaten the single-season record for jersey sales. Jul. 2 - 4:54 pm et
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press

You and I need to have a few Pabsts and talk football!!! GO Packfarves!!!

Culpepper sucked? Where were you and exactly what were you doing when he was in his heyday here? He was #1 overall pick one year in my fantasy draft. Guess what- I was living in Kansas City and played in a league with all KC fans then.

BTW- he made the cover of Madden, so couldn't have been too bad. Only cover of Madden Rodgers will ever be on is if he put his own pic in the plastic

He was overweight and had no brains!!!! Clueless if you ask me!!!

Overweight on the Lions, not for us. BTW- I don't think he ever ran out of the end zone in his career.

Ah yes, the two measures of greatness....making a pro bowl and being on the cover of Madden.

You're right- he musta sucked.

Culpepper 2004=
4,717 yards, 39 touchdowns, and 11 interceptions

Rodgers 2008=
4,038 yards, 28 tds, 13 ints.

Much better than anything we have had here, as you said- in a long time. Thats not including rushing yards/tds, do you really want me to go there? Culpepper was a ton better than Rodgers, until his knee injury. Go to Caribou- get some coffee gang. As far as Cunningham, I could put up highlights of the Vikes/Packers game in 98, but I don't wanna hear ya whine about the whoopin' that was dealt out by the purple that night.

Why didn't you use Culpepper's 2000 or 2002 stats?

I'd say that the 2000 stats should be used in this argument since that was his first full year in the NFL. Comparing those numbers to Rodger's first full year (2008) they look pretty much identical, and if you think Culpepper was great then apparently you're saying the same about Rodgers since their stats are essentially equal for their first year in the league.

Uhh, too much thinking and not enough testosterone, LMITOUT. A football fan should NEVER let reason overcome insanity!

But Limit- I am not the one saying the Vikings haven't had anything bad here in years- I am only pointing out we indeed have had some decent QBs here, and recently. I do think Rodgers is the second best in the division, and that will be eclipsed once #4 signs here. Cutler is #1.

OK, then why did you drag Rodgers into the fold? It's just the same p-ing match where to prove a point the other teams player is dragged into the discussion for no reason whatsoever instead of going on defense and defending the question at hand.

Apparently the Packers are the benchmark or gold standard because their players get compared to A LOT in this forum.