41685 Members
185 Forums
189235 Topics
1638797 Posts
Max Online: 2849 @ 01/05/09 01:16 PM
|
|
|
#1618407 - 12/02/08 07:05 AM
? on fish limits
|
Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 3
Loc: Minnesota
|
a ? on fish limits.. Statewide walleye limit is 6, If i go to LOW and Red on same trip, can i keep a combo of 6 walleyes? A warden on Red in June didn't exactly know the answer. Thanks
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618447 - 12/02/08 07:28 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: groove]
|
Sr FishingMN Family
Registered: 12/15/03
Posts: 515
Loc: Proctor MN.
|
WOW, thats a good question?? I would think your OK. You might need a Resort at LOTW mark and sign a slip that you were there and got your 4 fish. I dont think you can bring them on Red. You might have to leave them at a resort on shore.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618503 - 12/02/08 08:03 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: only ice]
|
HotSpotOutdoors Pro Staff
Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 4964
Loc: Waskish, MN
|
RED LAKE, UPPER including Shotley Brook and Tamarack River (Beltrami County). Northern pike: all from 26-40" must be immediately released. Only one over 40" allowed in possession. Walleye: Possession limit two, all from 17-26” must be immediately released, with only one over 26” through February 24, 2008. Beginning May 10, 2008 the possession limit is three fish, all from 17-26” must be immediately released, with only one over 26”. A person’s statewide bag limit may not include more than the current daily bag limit of Red Lake walleye. new If cumulative harvest exceeds the safe harvest level on Sept 30, 2008 the possession limit will revert back to two fish on Dec 1, 2008. If not, the possession limit will remain at three for the 2008-2009 winter season. While a person is on these waterbodies, fish carcasses from fish with size limits must be retained with head, spinal column, and tail intact and maintained in such a way that the carcass may be readily unpacked, unwrapped, and separated so that they may be examined, measured, and counted. Carcasses count towards a person’s possession. If maximum harvest caps are reached, these areas will be closed to the taking of walleye. At that time it will be unlawful to have any walleye in possession regardless of where taken while on or fishing in these waters. Please check access signs and DNR Web site for any changes. Those portions of Red Lake located within the Red Lake Indian Reservation are closed to Experimental/Special Regulations–Lakes TAMARAC NATIoNAL WILDLIFE REFUgE has differing regulations. Please check with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Possessing Fish • Daily and possession limits are the same unless otherwise noted. Fish are in an angler’s possession whether on hand, in cold storage, in transport, or elsewhere. • Once a daily or possession limit of fish has been reached, no culling or live-well sorting is allowed. • While on or fishing waters with size restrictions, all fish for which new the size restriction applies must have their heads, tails, fins, and skin intact and be measurable. A person may prepare and use the fish for a meal while docked or moored to shore, or while on the ice. Fish prepared and used for a meal still count towards the daily possession limit. DNR Information: (651) 2966157 or (888) 86466367 DNR Web site: mndnr.gov 9 • While on or fishing waters with size restrictions it is illegal to possess any fish outside legal length limits. • A person who is in transit and taking the most direct route back to their lodging or docking, and not fishing, may possess fish outside of or in excess of the limits for that water body, if legally taken from a connected water. As for walleye from other waters DO NOT BRING THEM ON THE ICE. It will be the same as last year where you need to leave your walleye from other waters on shore. Most of the resort and road operators have set-up a system for storing your fish while you are on Upper Red Lake. Another note is Upper Red Lake is experimental / special regulations water that is subject to change at any time. Check with your resort, road operation or outfitter on the latest regs waters. Changes will also be posted on the MN DNR website and the fishery department normally will print out flyers for all the road accesses to hand out.
Edited by Jonny P (12/02/08 08:16 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618514 - 12/02/08 08:08 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: only ice]
|
FishingMN Family
Registered: 11/28/08
Posts: 21
Loc: Shoreview, MN
|
"A person’s statewide bag limit may not include more than the current daily bag limit of Red Lake walleye". Per the special regulations in the DNR rule book for Upper Red Lake, so no you can't have fish from both lakes totaling 6.
Edited by iFishStu (12/02/08 08:08 AM)
_________________________
"Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." Will Rogers
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618553 - 12/02/08 08:21 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: iFishStu]
|
IceLeaders Family
Registered: 08/06/01
Posts: 222
Loc: Corcoran, MN , USA
|
I would disagree. That statement in the regs can be read both ways. Stan C.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618769 - 12/02/08 09:55 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: dtro]
|
Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 3
Loc: Minnesota
|
Thanks everyone, i agree with Jonny, safe bet is to leave the fish caught on either lake on shore, however i bet you will still need to prove someway they were caught on the lake you brought them from? CO could ask for proof you didn't go back to shore and deposit fish from same lake, then go back out. Assume this means that if you fish Red for two days you could have 6 walleyes on shore after second day? MAYBE??? Again proof is probably on you??
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618811 - 12/02/08 10:14 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: Jonny P]
|
Sr FishingMN Family
Registered: 03/20/08
Posts: 507
Loc: all over MN
|
Jonny- Is it a myth that the DNR can identify whether a walleye is from Red Lake based upon the meat/body of the fish? I know this sounds ridiculous, but I have had numerous people tell me this. I'm sure they have all heard the same rumor as well. Whenever someone tells me this, I just give them the "really?" response. Sounds like a good rumor to spread to deter people from keeping or possessing over their limt to me.
_________________________
drk.hanson@gmail.com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1618880 - 12/02/08 10:51 AM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: DHanson]
|
Sr FishingMN Family
Registered: 01/16/03
Posts: 375
Loc: waskish mn usa
|
If you have low walleyes you should have some type of proff you were up there a receipt from the area. Its simple no more then three upper red lake walleye in possion period.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1619066 - 12/02/08 12:24 PM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: cookie129]
|
IceLeaders Family
Registered: 06/06/08
Posts: 34
Loc: central mn
|
This also means if you catch your three in the morning you can not keep any that night, 3 per day!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1619210 - 12/02/08 01:21 PM
Re: ? on fish limits
[Re: groove]
|
FishingMN Family
Registered: 01/13/05
Posts: 131
Loc: East Bethel
|
groove..of course that is called double tripping and illegal as heck. As far as prooving it. The CO or someone else who could testify, would have to catch you in the act. (I believe this is the good old USA and you are innocent until proven guilty...last I checked)
Jonny is right as rain. If you are on URL you had better not have more than the possesion limit for that lake (3). If you are driving home on the road you can have fish from both lakes but not more than the statewide limit, total of 6. (and that includes what is in your freezer at home.) Thats my understanding of it all.
I cant wait to get up there again, its been a few years.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|