|
633 registered (&JAG, -ebby-, 10,000 Casts, 11-87, 123fish, 128prairie, 38 invisible),
1603
Guests and
29
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
41646 Members
185 Forums
189156 Topics
1637624 Posts
Max Online: 2849 @ 01/05/09 01:16 PM
|
|
|
#1603818 - 11/21/08 06:01 PM
Re: A cause for concern?
[Re: Heartman]
|
Sr FishingMN Family
Registered: 12/28/06
Posts: 390
|
As long as George Bush is gone, I'm going with change, in this case, is good.
Never change a winning game, always change a losing game. So Heartman, does the right to own a firearm hold any value at all to you? We have that now, so change would be? not having that right?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1604639 - 11/22/08 02:27 PM
Re: A cause for concern?
[Re: walleye101]
|
Sr IceLeaders Family
Registered: 04/24/02
Posts: 1886
Loc: Twin Cities
|
walleye101, read the post. He didn't say "All change is good" but "always change a losing hand". Do you think owning firearms is a losing hand? Didn't think so. Slow down & read. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1604779 - 11/22/08 05:41 PM
Re: A cause for concern?
[Re: Heartman]
|
Sr FishingMN Family
Registered: 12/28/06
Posts: 390
|
As long as George Bush is gone, I'm going with change, in this case, is good.
Never change a winning game, always change a losing game. OK Max, maybe you can help me understand the first sentence? It seems to say change is good. And since the topic is about gun control, my point was that if we currently enjoy our second ammendment rights, change (loosing those rights) may not necessarily be good.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
