Minnesota Fishing Wisconsin Hunting
HotSpotOutdoors.com

Fishing Minnesota
Fishing Wisconsin

"We Have More Fun"
Before Posting ANY - web address, commercial contact info, e-mail addresses or commercial pictures please Click Here for more information.
To get authorization to post for items or services wanted, or for sale items please Click Here
.
We insist that posts follow Forum Policy. Be sure to read it before posting. Thanks much.
Please keep your posts fun, friendly, and sharing with good family values.
You've Found the Best Outdoor Members on the Net Right here. Enjoy!


Register HereForum Policy - Please, you must read before using this forum. Thanks!Fishing Minnesota
Who's Online
196 registered (!wall-i-king, 1forwalleye, 2dalake, 311Hemi, 52luge, Adam Wolf, 15 invisible), 452 Guests and 36 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Outdoor Pro Store


On The Forums ...
TO's b-day
by KTapper
0 seconds ago
Solar panel on fishhouse What size and where is the best palce to ?
by Christopher Quast
6 minutes 12 seconds ago
How much does it roughly cost to fill a 100 lber + a couple other ???
by Christopher Quast
12 minutes 37 seconds ago
Which Tip Up
by Hoffer
12 minutes 59 seconds ago
just a little rant...
by Rost
20 minutes 50 seconds ago
how much is safe
by winniewalleye777
21 minutes 40 seconds ago
Weekend plans!
by b1gf1sh1
24 minutes 58 seconds ago
MUSKY COMING TO A LAKE NEAR YOU?
by DHanson
28 minutes 10 seconds ago
Deer hunting as it should (could) be
by propster
30 minutes 40 seconds ago
best combo for me and how much $
by b1gf1sh1
34 minutes 49 seconds ago
Newest Members
Adirondacker, Eyez9, bingobob, SDhunter, xcelr8n
40479 Registered Users
Top Posters today
harvey lee 37
Sandmannd 37
dtro 27
mrklean 22
shackbash 20
LEP7MM 18
CrappieFshr651 18
stfcatfish 17
drewski 15
Dbl 15
Forum Stats
40479 Members
185 Forums
183465 Topics
1568645 Posts

Max Online: 3699 @ 05/13/08 12:57 PM
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#1558731 - 10/15/08 12:06 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: jerkbait]
Sandmannd Offline
Sr HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 01/16/06
Posts: 6727
Loc: St. Paul, MN
Picture of the fish from KARE 11

_________________________
"Making the decision to have a child is momentous. It is to decide forever to have your heart go walking around outside your body." ~Elizabeth Stone

Top
#1558770 - 10/15/08 12:28 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: Sandmannd]
chasineyes Offline
IceLeaders Family

Registered: 01/13/08
Posts: 200
Loc: Shakopee, MN
Maybe he's a victim of the economy?:)

Top
#1558795 - 10/15/08 12:55 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: chasineyes]
Gary Crichton Offline
Sr FishingMN Family

Registered: 01/16/08
Posts: 1206
Loc: Richfield/Deer River
So what happens to the fish. Is it given away to the food shelves or Senior Citizens home.

G.C.
_________________________
Gary C

Top
#1558820 - 10/15/08 01:19 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: chasineyes]
nofishfisherman Offline
Sr HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 01/31/05
Posts: 2426
Loc: Twin Cities
Originally Posted By: chasineyes
Maybe he's a victim of the economy?:)


Actually I think he said it was Bush's fault. I may actually believe him. grin
_________________________
"I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here."

Top
#1558845 - 10/15/08 01:56 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: nofishfisherman]
Sandmannd Offline
Sr HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 01/16/06
Posts: 6727
Loc: St. Paul, MN
Nope, he said he was saving them for Norm Coleman's Rally and Norm gave him the OK! laugh
_________________________
"Making the decision to have a child is momentous. It is to decide forever to have your heart go walking around outside your body." ~Elizabeth Stone

Top
#1558859 - 10/15/08 02:04 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: Sandmannd]
stfcatfish Online   content
HotSpotOutdoors Pro Staff

Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 16192
Loc: Ely, MN
Glad you guys are all done bickering over how many walleye fillets one person should eat for a meal. That was really important stuff right there. grin grin grin

The picture worries me a bit. If they were almost all frozen in packets, they would have to be thawed at least partially to separate them enough to take this picture.

I understand they needed to get a count on how many over his limit he was, but what did the DNR do with all that thawed walleye?
_________________________
"Because you have seen something doesn't mean you can explain it." Barry Lopez, Arctic Dreams
stevefossimages@yahoo.com
Wedding photography, guided photo excursions and fine art prints
Member, Canon Professional Services and Professional Photographers of America
Support our fine Fishing Minnesota Sponsors

Top
#1558926 - 10/15/08 03:11 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: stfcatfish]
SkitterPopper Offline
FishingMN Family

Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 138
Loc: Eagan, Mn
Quote:
Daily and possession limits are the same unless otherwise noted. Fishare in an angler’s possession whether on hand, in cold storage, in transport, or elsewhere.


Straight out of the DNR regulations. You can have your daily limit and thats it. If you gift fish they are still part of your possession until they are consumed. Are they going to catch you if you gift some fillets to "Uncle Herb", probably not. I guess it comes down to if you believe in breaking laws or obeying them. I personally take only what I am allowed.

Top
#1558974 - 10/15/08 03:56 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: SkitterPopper]
candiru Offline
IceLeaders Family

Registered: 08/31/05
Posts: 183
Loc: Out West
A big thank you to someone out there that called the TIP line instead of just complaining about lawbreaking that they saw on an internet forum. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!

Top
#1559014 - 10/15/08 04:28 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: stfcatfish]
Big Tom Offline
Sr FishingMN Family

Registered: 12/03/03
Posts: 645
Loc: Elk River
Originally Posted By: stfcatfish
what did the DNR do with all that thawed walleye?


I just hope they aren't for the next North American Wildlife Enforcement Officers Association conference or a perk for Outdoor Heritage Fund participants. smile

Top
#1559046 - 10/15/08 05:10 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: Big Tom]
Sandmannd Offline
Sr HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 01/16/06
Posts: 6727
Loc: St. Paul, MN
That was a low blow, but kinda funny.

Do they have to re-freeze them and save for evidence, or does the piture itself serve as the evidence? If they are thawed, I hope they went to a food shelf or at least a fish fry of sorts. I would hate to see all those nice fillets go to waste.
_________________________
"Making the decision to have a child is momentous. It is to decide forever to have your heart go walking around outside your body." ~Elizabeth Stone

Top
#1559049 - 10/15/08 05:13 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: Sandmannd]
stfcatfish Online   content
HotSpotOutdoors Pro Staff

Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 16192
Loc: Ely, MN
My hope is they were refrozen and donated. If they had to hold on to them in case they needed to produce them as physical evidence, it wouldn't have had to be for very long. Those cases tend to move through the system pretty quickly, and the guy pleading guilty would have sped it up more.
_________________________
"Because you have seen something doesn't mean you can explain it." Barry Lopez, Arctic Dreams
stevefossimages@yahoo.com
Wedding photography, guided photo excursions and fine art prints
Member, Canon Professional Services and Professional Photographers of America
Support our fine Fishing Minnesota Sponsors

Top
#1559058 - 10/15/08 05:22 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: Sandmannd]
Big Tom Offline
Sr FishingMN Family

Registered: 12/03/03
Posts: 645
Loc: Elk River
Originally Posted By: Sandmannd
That was a low blow, but kinda funny.


Agreed. That's why I inserted the smiley. For the record, I have a great deal of respect for most of the C.O.'s out there. Most are way underpaid and way overworked. If you look at some of the reports of the stuff they deal with as published in the "Outdoor News", it makes your head spin. Too many NUTZ to deal with and leadership that has been uneven at best.

Top
#1559083 - 10/15/08 05:54 PM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: nofishfisherman]
irvingdog Online   happy
Sr IceLeaders Family

Registered: 01/01/03
Posts: 1495
Loc: Robbinsdale Mn.
Originally Posted By: nofishfisherman
Without the possession limit we would have every guy in MN with a deep freeze full of fish fillets.

But it wouldn't happen for long, if you know what I mean.

The posession limit certainly helps with enforcement.
I can easily feed my family on 4-16" walleye; even my bottomless pit 8 year old son. That's what fried potatoes and beans are for.

I notice it took a day for this to get posted. Many folks have not been to terribly outraged. Imagine if he was from Chicago on vacation, or worse yet, Hmong! Then the screamers would be out for sure, calling for his head. The guy broke a clear, well documented law in a gross fashion. His fishing license should be toast, fines paid, and rightfully scorned by law abiding sportsmen. We engage our hobbies in the woods and on the water with a great deal of privacy. When honestly and honor are gone, what's left?
_________________________
"Political correctness is just tyranny with manners. I wish for you the courage to be unpopular. Popularity is history's pocket change. Courage is history's true currency." -- Charlton Heston

Top
#1559518 - 10/16/08 01:05 AM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: irvingdog]
PEATMOSS Offline
FishingMN Family

Registered: 12/01/05
Posts: 127
Loc: itasca co mn
There seem to be 2 schools of thought among fishermen and hunters today.

The newer school seems to view fishing as a purely recreational pursuit. This group is gennerally concerned with catching (and usually releasing) more and bigger fish. This group is likely to support some species as totally off limits to consumption and fairly strict restrictions regarding harvest of others. This same group would likely support deer regulations designed to increase antler size. The word "quality" seems to be a buzzword for this group.

Others of us, myself included, enjoy our outdoor pursuits passionately, but take a bit more of a practical approach.
While supporting good stewardship and appropriate fish and game management, harvest and consumption of our natural resources is not something we are ashamed of. Storing fish, that were legally caught for later use does not seem all that outrageous. I'm not talking about a group or individual that violates daily limits or other laws like out of season fishing, spearing or netting. Simply, if a person harvests a fish legally, when he or she consumes it should be their business. I have no idea why the individual in this story piled up that many walleyes, but if he had eaten or gifted them he would have been in compliance with the law even though the same number of fish had been harvested in the same manner. This simply does not make alot of sense to me.

Top
#1559723 - 10/16/08 09:24 AM Re: Just a couple extra, no big deal.. [Re: PEATMOSS]
jerkbait Offline
FishingMN Family

Registered: 02/09/07
Posts: 162
Loc: LOW, MN. Long point area
Originally Posted By: PEATMOSS
There seem to be 2 schools of thought among fishermen and hunters today.

The newer school seems to view fishing as a purely recreational pursuit. This group is gennerally concerned with catching (and usually releasing) more and bigger fish. This group is likely to support some species as totally off limits to consumption and fairly strict restrictions regarding harvest of others. This same group would likely support deer regulations designed to increase antler size. The word "quality" seems to be a buzzword for this group.

Others of us, myself included, enjoy our outdoor pursuits passionately, but take a bit more of a practical approach.
While supporting good stewardship and appropriate fish and game management, harvest and consumption of our natural resources is not something we are ashamed of. Storing fish, that were legally caught for later use does not seem all that outrageous. I'm not talking about a group or individual that violates daily limits or other laws like out of season fishing, spearing or netting. Simply, if a person harvests a fish legally, when he or she consumes it should be their business. I have no idea why the individual in this story piled up that many walleyes, but if he had eaten or gifted them he would have been in compliance with the law even though the same number of fish had been harvested in the same manner. This simply does not make alot of sense to me.


Exactly!! someone sees my point. The daily limit is still met either way and the same amount of fish are taken, wether eaten or frozen. If the law said that your posesion limit could be 6 daily limits you would still be required to follow the daily limit. I am not saying he is in the right, but I would like to see the law changed IMO.
_________________________
Nothing better than a sunken bobber

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >


Moderator:  Dave 
Hot Spot Outdoors


Ice Leaders Sponsors


Support our Sponsors